Philippine Bidding Documents
(As Harmonized with Development Partners)
Procurement of INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Government of the Republic of the Philippines
Fourth Edition
December 2010
1. Area per computation does not tally with the area per title | |||
Activity | Percentage | Cost | Procedure |
1.1 Research | 30 % | Inquire from LRA,LMB, LMS, CENRO, PENRO, Court, Archives, National Library, ROD, Municipal/City/Provincial Assessor, MPDO (secure certification as to non-availability of data), fellow private GEs Research the names of the adjacent owners | |
1.2 Reconnaissance | 10% | Identification of adjacent owners Location of tie point, old points, PRS’92 points and other points with known geographic position | |
1.3 Conduct of Survey | 30% | Issue Survey Notification Letter Conduct of Perimeter Survey using hand held GPS (in case of tie line doubt) Field Work: Use engr’s transit or total station in case of missing sides or blurred technical descriptions Office Work: computation and cartographic works Preparation of Sketch Plan (preferably 1:4000) Request for pre-projection at the LMS | |
1.4 Preparation of Complete Survey Returns | 5% | Office Work: Computation and cartographic works | |
1.5 Documentation | 10% | ||
1.6 Submission | 5% | ||
1.7 IVAS | 10% | ||
100% | For the 1st has. or fraction thereof |
2. Missing Side (three sides or more) | |||
Activity | Percentage | Cost | Procedure |
2.1. Solution by three point problem | 15% | ||
2.2 Conduct of Survey | 40% | ||
2.3 Preparation of Complete Survey Returns | 15% | ||
2.4 Documentation & Submission | 20% | ||
2.5 IVAS | 10% | ||
TOTAL | 100% | PhP 15,000.00 |
3. Cannot be located on the ground(GFI,Foreclosed Properties) | |||
Activity | Percentage | Cost | Procedure |
3.1 Back Tracking of previous owner | 10% | ||
3.2 Boundary Computation and Geographic Position, | 10% | ||
3.3 Pre-projection at LMS | 5% | ||
3.4 Further research Based on the result of Pre-projection | 10% | ||
3.5 Encoding of Data gathered | 10% | ||
3.6 Conduct of Survey | 25% | ||
3.7 Preparation of Complete Survey Returns | 10% | ||
3.8 Documentation & Submission | 10% | ||
3.9 IVAS | 10% | ||
TOTAL | 100 % | PhP |
4. Tie Point (no vailable geographic position) | |||
Activity | Percentage | Cost | Procedure |
4.1 research all adjoining lots or available approved survey plans. | 10% | ||
4.2 Secure certified Xerox copy of Titled properties | 20% | ||
4.3 Computation and Plottings of research data | 10% | ||
4.4 Conduct of Survey | 30% | ||
4.5 Preparation of Complete Survey Returns | 10% | ||
4.6 Documentation & Submission | 10% | ||
4.7 IVAS | 10% | ||
TOTAL | 100% |
5. Old surveys not accepted during cadastral survey or nor reflected in the CM/PM | |||
Activity | Percentage | Cost | Procedure |
5.1 Secure certified true copy of title | 10% | ||
5.2 Researc h at Municipal/ City Assesors of Adjacent Lots | 10% | ||
5.3 Research Old Survey Plan (PSU,H, F,II, Etc.) at LMS and other offices | 10% | Secure Certification from diff. agencies concerned | |
5.4 Computation and Plottings of researched data | 5% | ||
5.5 Pre-projection at LMS | 5% | ||
5.6 Further research based on the result of Pre-projection | 10% | ||
5.7 Preparation of Complete Survey Returns | 10% | ||
5.8 Documentation & Submission | 15% | ||
5.9 Request for Reflection in the Cadastral Map | 10% | ||
5.10 Annotation at the back of the Title of the equivalent Cadastral lot | 15% | ||
TOTAL | 100% | PhP |
6. Covered by previous survey | ||||
Activity | Percentage | Cost | Procedure | |
6.1 Conduct research of covering surveys | 10% | |||
6.2 Computation and Plottings of researched data | 10% | Prepare map into one system | ||
6.3 Preparation of Complete Survey Returns | 10% | |||
6.4 Request for Reflection in the Cadastral Map | 15% | |||
6.5 Double check on the ground of the outcome of reflection of the previous survey | 20% | |||
6.6 Re-submittal of Complete Survey Returns | 15% | |||
6.7 Documentation & Submission | 10% | |||
6.8 IVAS | 10% | |||
TOTAL | 100% | PhP |